9 September 2020

As long as virtually all economies around the world experience the phenomenon whereby any technological advancement requires only profitability, breakthrough technologies will face resistance, both economically and socially, stemming from a lack of adequate media coverage. Systemic resistance means their creators can't afford to gain the necessary clout. This has been the case throughout history, and history has a way of repeating itself: priority in the rationalization of ventures and inventions always goes to those with access to funding, regardless of their background. How do they usually obtain funding? Regardless of the rational and technological level of their plans, they gain economic support and technological backing from specific political spheres that will provide such assistance, and that's where it all begins. It's no surprise that, despite the inherent flaws of the technology, they all profit, ignoring the true public interest, precisely at the expense of this society, once again ripped off, needs no explanation. They aren't called harmful to society and civilization, or saboteurs slowing down progress, but rather benefactors and distinguished contributors to the technology (!) that is meant to be used by the masses. Completely forgotten, the actual technology, impoverished by underfunding, lies fallow, unused. All it takes is imagination and intuition to grasp the sheer volume of this. These are reams of documentation that will never be implemented. An inventor representing a breakthrough technology who, due to the fact that his technology is not supported and understood in the existing power play, tries to implement his idea in general social and economic conditions, most often abandons its implementation due to the unyielding financial barrier related to legalizing the patent (in Poland, maintaining patent rights annually costs up to several hundred thousand zlotys in the case of an international patent). Some time ago, I decided to go to the rationalization office that handles the appointment of a patent examiner and subsequent patent protection for inventions to see what conditions I would face if I wanted to patent some of my ideas, and I did. As it turned out, simply appointing an expert to present the idea for a patent office opinion costs anywhere from a few thousand to several dozen thousand zlotys. I was then informed that maintaining a patent after approval by the patent office in Poland alone requires spending not just a few thousand zlotys annually, but tens of thousands. Obtaining an international patent can cost hundreds of thousands annually. Obtaining this knowledge also put an end to my dreams of becoming wealthy from the inventions I've been posting here for some time now, and since then, I've been sharing them for free, as I wouldn't have earned anything from them if I hadn't been able to overcome the barriers set by these legal provisions. Such barriers discourage and centrally determine who will succeed in society and under what conditions, favoring the wealthy but often lacking a deeper technological vision. The type and potential of the ideas presented seem irrelevant, which is not surprising, yet frustrating. From my experience, I can say that technological concrete, involving the modification of existing technology, is always preferred over a comprehensive new idea, and the patents obtained are mostly based on this type of concrete and its processing into various derivatives. This concrete, which sets the bar poured over the head of the average scientist, whose work most often contributes to the economic growth of their own country based on values and foundations established by their employers, is a maximum ceiling, and anyone who rises above this threshold is heavily criticized and subject to various sanctions, while their opportunities are limited by a series of efficiently operating economic mechanisms. All this is understandable if economic interest were considered the ultimate priority, but it must be remembered that this priority could be significantly revised if completely new technologies were allowed to have a say, instead of processing in a way that appears scandalous what blocks the fundamental progress of civilization, actually preventing the emergence of new opportunities available on Earth for billions of people.

9 September 2020

Space propulsion is no ordinary propulsion system in a planetary environment. If a civilization's technological advancement is measured by its ability to move through space, then propulsion systems capable of moving in a vacuum are an excellent indicator. Another aspect of technology that determines a civilization's advancement is the amount of energy consumed by a given civilization over a given period of time, as N. Kardashov argued, and special formulas have even been developed to determine this. However, these two determinants may share a direct correlation. Another determinant, which depends on adaptability, measured, among other things, by intelligence in spacecraft design. This ability, whether alien or theoretical, designers gain during the evolutionary process within their own planet, seems obvious. The inherent capacity for expansion, where higher-level intelligence seems to play a crucial role. Other civilizations from beyond our solar system?superintelligent constructors?may have long since left their star system and lack the limitations on space travel typical of constructors commonly known to the international public on Earth. Less intelligent inhabitants of planets where nothing interesting usually happens, wherever resources needed for interstellar trade and commodity exchange are found, could potentially be unwitting participants in the exploitation of their own raw material reserves by technologically advanced civilizations, for whom the barriers of vast interstellar distances no longer pose a significant problem. Here, the ability to move in a vacuum plays a fundamental role; without this ability, low-organized and less advanced civilizations in our galaxy are meaningless in the federation of planets and are subject to a non-interference clause. Of course, an equally likely situation could be a state in which a civilization has already reached such a technological level that it no longer requires any external raw materials, because everything needed is produced through the materialization-dematerialization process of matter in appropriate systems with closed energy circulation. These are merely speculations, but plausible nonetheless. While they are being constructed, there's a subconscious assumption that they might be true, something some may already know from old sci-fi movies... and others from short stories and novellas. The true intentions of alien civilizations regarding Earth's civilization, however, are a closely guarded secret and are managed under the complete control of those who decide, and they are likely the masters of the fate of billions of Earthlings, focused on cultivating daily duties and professing one faith or another in our times. However, the truth is that it doesn't matter who lives and learns, where, and when?if they live in the same cosmos, they are bound by the same physical laws, which we have only just begun to understand. As we progress, we become increasingly certain about certain issues. In fact, through this conviction, we define and shape our future. It seems as if humanity has focused on limitations rather than the possibilities already demonstrated by many visionary designers. Where increased attention from the right people should have been, certain forms of technology have been completely dismissed to the margins of science and technology. This unfavorable phenomenon is further supported by a specific set of economic ties ? the system would not have lasted very long if it weren't for the enormous sums of money and the interests of people eager to exploit Earth's resources. One cannot help but feel that the development of space exploration in its current form is currently facing serious difficulties, as the enormous sums of money directed towards the construction of increasingly powerful rockets are a tendency close to fraud, intended to obscure the true picture of needs and serve to justify the ruthless exploitation of our home planet in order to implement new forms of economic slavery and maintain a senseless technological advantage.These words, despite everything, are supported by reality, because let's consider how enslaved humans are, playing the role of pawns in the hands of fuel, energy, and media corporations on Earth, and how dependent they are on energy carriers, chemicals, and many everyday things without which life is impossible. In the past, humans weren't as entangled in everything as they are now. Life didn't require as much, and they were content with a technologically less advanced environment, which meant they were closer to nature, which had its advantages and disadvantages. However, they were certainly healthier and mentally stronger in many respects than today's computerized and cybernetic humans. Until someone is presented with new possibilities, not necessarily those that positively impact their development, they will remain unaware of them and happy with what they have. It's okay that progress is occurring, but some of the positive functions associated with human life in a changing environment are being permanently relegated to oblivion. We gain new opportunities with the development of civilization, but the changes we observe increasingly raise concerns about their direction, as they appear to be depraving both the intellectual sphere (overly absorbing intellectual abilities and preventing rest) and the emotional sphere. Humans need success and a space free from pollution, expressed as what they don't need. We don't need to clutter our surroundings, but we do it all the time. Ever since we acquired the ability and need for exploration, we dream of conquering new living spaces, despite the fact that we can't maintain order in our own backyards. This is where our fascination with the unknown comes from. However, considering the hundreds of light-years separating us from the adventure of new worlds, one might conclude that humanity currently has no choice but to focus on such inhospitable planets as Mars or Venus, available within our own solar system. We won't develop suitable propulsion systems quickly, as progress has entered a phase of regression, verified by economics and the science of Einstein's and Newton's laws. This is happening even as we enter the next century, and more and more people are disappointed by the poor quality of knowledge acquired in schools. What is most interesting and fascinating is currently scientific apocryphal, and access to this information is limited by the media and devalued by the correspondingly evasive propaganda of current technologies by their distributors. The global situation is dire regarding the status of new propulsion systems, and any unconventional ideas have not gained significant traction to date, which is plain to see. It must be stated that current methods of duplicating information and processing available technologies will not yield key solutions capable of changing the current state of affairs in space technology. The technology remains dangerous, and colonization of adjacent planets on a large scale using rocket propulsion is still impossible. That's why it's so concerning that a significant portion of the market has been taken over by people who refuse to acknowledge this fact and are relentlessly pursuing this strategy, despite not fully mastering the available technology. A lot of money doesn't necessarily guarantee success, and the inability to survey the technological landscape and draw conclusions can be costly... For years, people were kept unaware of real, accessible technologies, which were being developed simultaneously by laboratories and often by technological geniuses, almost forgotten today. How it was that, despite all the enormous financial resources flowing in, throughout the 20th century, those in the science and technology community were unable to present anything better than jet or rocket propulsion, promoting it so effectively that other solutions were neither available nor affordable. None of the rebellious and often most eccentric geniuses were able to change this situation over the years, because to this day, the public uses no solutions other than those provided by publicly available science and technology, is, to put it mildly, very strange. Other technology does exist, and this has been proven many times, but it seems that certain people responsible for the image of modern technology were unable to accept this fact, acting under the dictates of money coming from "above" for purposes often far from pacifism. It's not good when the majority of progress on Earth is achieved through the use of technology developed for military purposes, as if there were no other methods. Examples include nuclear technology (the production of plutonium for atomic bombs), rocket propulsion (rockets starting with the V2 and carrying nuclear payloads), and many other examples, which could be multiplied. The emergence of all these technologies has placed the world at a crossroads and threatened by problems that threaten the very existence of civilization more than one might imagine. The true strength of civilization lies not in its military capabilities or the ability to produce energy, most of which is wasted anyway. This strength lies in the potential latent in the human mind, but this potential is not easily unleashed, and it seems as if someone still wants to reduce humanity to slavery, preventing it from realizing its own potential for the rest of its existence on Earth.