9 September 2020

Our laboratory is working on inertial, magnetic, and gravity propulsion systems, ultimately aiming to develop effective solutions in this area, as well as appropriate control electronics for drones and manned inertial propulsion vehicles. This section presents recent projects and experiments conducted at the laboratory. Most of the electronics experiments were performed on a prototyping board. The demonstrated inertial experiments are in the preliminary phase, due to a lack of appropriate equipment, as the laboratory is still developing and lacks permanent funding. All of the experiments presented here were aimed at developing the manual and intellectual skills necessary to achieve the primary goal of opening the way for mass human use of inertial and gravity propulsion systems, which should ultimately result in unlimited and seamless access to space for ordinary people. The activities of space companies such as SpaceX, Blue Origin, and Virgin Galactic seem beneficial to humanity, but they pursue their goals using proven, yet conventional, and therefore ineffective, methods, such as rocket propulsion. With all due respect to these companies, they will achieve nothing more than Mars or Jupiter orbit in the near future in terms of manned flights using only rocket propulsion. Ultimately, freeing the planet's inhabitants from the bonds of gravity seems to be becoming an important and significant goal in itself. Nevertheless, the vision guiding the laboratory's activities is broader, as it also includes offering ordinary people a universal source of electrical energy based on magnetic or inertial-gravitational forces, as well as introducing both individual and collective ground transportation with entirely new technological capabilities that go beyond current scientific and technological frameworks. In the case of inertial drives, simplicity of design and, consequently, of execution is crucial. It's generally known that the fewer parts in a system, including moving parts, the lower the failure rate. Rotary inertial drives are subject to numerous adverse physical phenomena that can cause many designers to lose sleep over the winter. Above all, the main challenge is minimizing friction, rolling resistance, unnecessary excess work of the structural material, and material fatigue. The systems I present can most often be divided into two types. The first type are asymmetric rotary mechanical devices, and the second type are devices that utilize magnetic energy, or both mechanical and magnetic energy. Since childhood, I've been interested in electric motors, rotors, generators, and electronics; it took nearly 20 years for my ultimate interests to crystallize. I'm currently working on inertial and magnetic drives in my own laboratory, which is currently in the initial stages of hardware development. What poses the greatest challenge in the construction of operational devices generating linear thrust based on inertial, centrifugal, and magnetic forces is the transition from the design phase to concrete prototypes, especially when advanced technological resources are lacking. Companies that manufacture, for example, cars or airplanes possess advanced technological resources, but in the case of drives operating solely on gravitational, magnetic, or inertial forces, they refrain from attempting to develop appropriate solutions. I don't know the reasons for this, but it seems to be related to the decision-making process at the management level, where specific production assumptions are made for millions of customers, based on a pre-established technological base. The psychological barrier inherent in the entire transition between commonly used and new technology is significant in this case. The second issue is a lack of faith in this type of technology and its substantive and technical foundations. This leads to the outright rejection of certain solutions without examining the relevant facts that could support such technologies. The problem lies in the education people receive from an early age. Later, these individuals are unable to think independently, only in accordance with scientific canon. This effectively makes them a kind of mental handicap, condemned to the monotony of common solutions in science and technology. They cannot ignite the spark that would break the mold necessary, for example, to begin deep space exploration. Underestimating certain technological solutions in the fields of magnetism, inertia, and gravity leads to the disastrous consequences to which our civilization is exposed. Widespread scientific and technological arrogance is limiting the possibilities available to both humanity and each individual inhabiting our planet. Technological tycoons are absolute dictators, earning billions from technological tyranny. Unfortunately, my laboratory lacks such funds and must grapple with a constant lack of resources to ensure its own development. The global situation is heavily fiscalized, and unfortunately, capital is in the hands of people who are de facto less interested in breaking the deadlock and more interested in profiting from the exploitation of international society. It's difficult to say whether this course, chosen on a global scale, will bring a happy ending to civilization, because we have advanced artificial intelligence with a vast amount of software and electronics, and we also have nuclear technology, but these technologies do not allow for the achievement of new technological quality and do not enable the transformation in the lives of billions as much as could be desired. Despite all these years, there has been no revolution in propulsion, and thus, the framework of current forms of transportation available to humans has not changed. This unfortunately has a direct impact on the standards and quality of life on this planet. Civilization needs transportation solutions, both within and beyond Earth, that are adequate to the needs, rather than filling a technological gap with disproportionately low-cost technology whose modifications will not lead to a significant breakthrough in the long term. My laboratory was established to introduce this type of technology, but so far, I have been limited to a very small group of people willing to help. The work I have completed so far is investment-based, and I don't know when I will be able to profit from bringing my own solutions to market. In Poland, the balance of power is rather unfavorable for young inventors presenting similar solutions; in fact, there aren't many of them, and the problem is not popular and is not the subject of media coverage. Like elsewhere in the world, in Poland, there is a lack of trust in non-standard technologies, as inadequate education has had its effect here too. Scientific beliefs prevent us from breaking down technological barriers and, consequently, investing in the necessary research that could develop into a useful technology with significant potential. A lack of support and interest leads to these technologies falling into the technological margins, making them invisible to potential investors. It's very difficult to assemble a group of passionate individuals in Poland who want to form a team dedicated to success; in Poland, these are simply individuals. Typically, in working groups, there's a division of labor and skills among individuals. Unfortunately, I'm forced to do everything myself, from scratch, even though I don't know everything or have the skills to do it all. This limits progress to a minimal pace. I already have some equipment, such as a precision lathe and milling machine, as well as a small 3D printer, which a friend and I managed to restore to working order and improve its technical parameters. It wasn't working at all when I bought it. I still have some major work ahead of me. I'll soon be able to begin working on the milling machine and lathe, after purchasing the appropriate accessories for these machines. However, these are only modeling machines and are small enough not to allow for larger projects. Nevertheless, they will allow me to build prototypes of small devices that will either confirm or refute my basic technical assumptions. If they confirm, I can continue working to launch a series of, for example, terrain-photography drones with parameters that will surpass standard propeller-driven drones. Moreover, this work will provide me with sufficient funds to initiate more serious work, which will focus on producing heavier devices capable of lifting heavier payloads, including a personal air transport system designed for one person, similar to the Martin Jet Pack, but without its fundamental flaws. Later, if these efforts prove successful, I could consider designing fully equipped vehicles for stratospheric and space flights. Such efforts would likely be highly sought after in specific environments, such as those related to air transport, so what I do as a hobby would no longer be solely about hobby, as it currently is. However, if my assumptions regarding inertial propulsion prove illusory, I have several other ideas related to the use of magnetic fields, which I would also like to verify, as unverified knowledge is worthless when it comes to future activities based on its application. I don't want to build something sloppy and crude. I'm interested in elegant technical solutions with groundbreaking technological capabilities, so I don't want to rush my work. I think society will eventually appreciate my work, and funding will be found for further research. However, for now, I think I should do some work myself to gain interest from certain groups and to demonstrate that my technological concepts are grounded in reality. If that happens, and I manage to convince certain people to cooperate, which is, after all, for the good of all, then the funding will be available sooner or later. I think it would be a good idea to produce educational toys for children, who would benefit from learning about unconventional technologies from the ground up, so they could become interested in them in the future, improve them technically themselves, and become true masters of piloting and space exploration when the time comes. Instead of watching movies and playing on the computer, we should teach children programming and things like that so that they do not become technologically helpless in the future and control the world, instead of being controlled by systems such as artificial intelligence.