Nowadays, electricity is generated by converting heat into work, always with a certain efficiency. The decay of heavy elemental nuclei, such as uranium-235, uranium-233 from thorium, or plutonium, produces energy that powers turbine generators in power plants. Other energy sources include hard coal, lignite, natural gas, and fuel oil, all of which contain significantly less energy than uranium per unit mass. Consuming a kilogram of uranium produces more energy than burning several hundred tons of coal, making it a very high-energy medium. The raw technology available to humans is dwarfed by the amount of energy contained in the energy of spatial fluctuations, a volume of which, if held in a 250 ml glass, would evaporate all the oceans on Earth. However, the knowledge available on Earth currently does not allow for any extraction of this energy (only inefficient solutions and work using cavitation vortices are known), because there is no understanding of how this energy interacts with matter to convert it into known forms of energy. However, there are other forms and sources of energy that can be said to be already available, one of them being potential energy and magnetic field energy. The electromagnetic energy of space in the form of vacuum fluctuations stems from and is confirmed by the equations and works of Paul A. M. Dirac, who first proposed the existence of so-called virtual matter?pairs of matter and antimatter particles that instantly annihilate before acquiring mass. It is also a precursor to the fundamentals of physics that later became known as effects now experimentally demonstrated in quantum physics, such as the Casimir effect, which involves the behavior of space on a very small quantum scale. This type of behavior of the vacuum and space demonstrates that energy can be generated from virtually nothing. What else can you call a vacuum if not an emptiness, with no matter in it? The greater the potential of this "nothingness," the greater the energy that can be obtained for energy purposes, such as powering vehicles. Dirac was one of the first physicists to discuss antimatter and its role in cosmology and the structure of the universe. He postulated the existence of a universe composed of antimatter, equivalent to a material universe. Although experimental data have not yet confirmed some of his theories, certain works, such as the introduction of the determinants "ket" and "bra," remain relevant and are used by scientists today. A few years ago, or rather, it was probably at the beginning of my adventure with computers and the internet, I came across interesting materials on energy production that differed significantly technologically from what I had been taught in school about electricity, magnetic fields, and thermodynamics as embodied in the three laws of thermodynamics. According to what I was taught, energy cannot be created from nothing; science based on this principle is determined to question all closed systems isolated in terms of energy flow and transformation, their fundamentals, and energy production, even if they have clear evidence of their operation, that is, that they operate contrary to the laws of thermodynamics or other widely respected and popular scientific conventions. It's simple: current technologies based on converting one energy into another require fuel or other energy carriers, such as solar radiation and the atomic energy of radioactive decay, etc. It's impossible to speak of free energy in general, as modern science lacks the ability to theoretically describe or calculate certain specific situations in which energy is not produced by chemical reactions or nuclear transformation processes. Generally, all technology and civilization rely on these two energy fields. This group also includes hydropower, tidal power, wind power, and geothermal energy. However, what if the gap in science between its mathematical description and the constructive understanding of certain processes still exists and is not unknown to any scientist? What's missing is a fundamental and coherent illustration of the fundamental manifestations of reality, such as understanding the nature and relationship of gravity with the vacuum and its geometry at the smallest scales and below. This fact affects the existing possibilities for understanding the interdependence of gravitational and inertial fields, particularly their relationship at the grassroots level. Currently, colossal sums are being invested in thermonuclear fusion, while on the other hand, we have other solutions developed by inventors who have been sidelined in technology to this day, and contemporary inventors who are striving to break through with their work. Few, however, manage to achieve this in such a spectacular manner as Tesla and SpaceX, for example. However, one can attempt to understand this situation in terms of the fact that specific conditions and circumstances likely operate here, with some conducting a significant market demand analysis aimed at combining non-conflicting, complementary technologies in conjunction with specific realities and needs of the moment. However, no one has yet managed to change the "core" of the technology, and therefore, we will have to wait a long time for a strategy of technological change implemented through slow evolution, which, due to this fact, no one knows in what direction it will go and what the final result will be. In particular, no coherent, unifying form has yet been found for energy production methods; the entire system remains fragmented into technologically divergent production methods. This situation negatively impacts consumer energy prices. It's unrealistic to expect the system to suddenly unravel, allowing individuals to enter this civilizational hegemony, potentially crippling the economic coffin of the current technological giants. Unfortunately, the same principle of first come, first served has applied and continues to apply. Therefore, society must adapt to a particular technology, effectively leaving it without any significant choice regarding price or the quality of services provided, simply to prevent the civilizational machine from changing course, which would be unacceptable to the beneficiaries of this closed system. Therefore, generating energy using methods that deviate from the norm may be viewed with suspicion, both through legal regulations for those attempting to implement them, and by being poorly tolerated by energy companies, who may perceive them as detrimental to their own interests, or simply counterproductive from their perspective. This is likely why civilization at this stage has not yet reached the appropriate level of existence and self-awareness to develop technologies capable of unleashing human energy. The struggle for energy carriers has led, and continues to do so, to numerous bloody military conflicts throughout history and has left a visible mark on almost every aspect of international politics among many of the most economically powerful institutions and countries. This situation will likely persist, as economic considerations currently outweigh the general welfare of society. A significant problem, however, is that establishing the foundations for an energy-generating system is one thing, and rationalizing it is quite another. Currently, ready-made technologies exist that have the potential to radically transform the development of energy production. However, it is clear that energy demand is not always the primary determinant of civilizational development. Through the era of zero energy consumption, where children could not study at night, after dusk, or went blind by kerosene lamps, it has become clear how much progress in electricity production has contributed to the expansion of opportunities on a global scale and increased prosperity. Without computers powered by electricity generated from burning coal, gas, nuclear technology, and the like, virtually no complex work would be possible. There will likely be a time and a proper moment for unifying energy production worldwide, because energy is available everywhere, and a vacuum is not just a void; it is a substance brimming with energy, from which we will one day learn to generate electricity and heat in a perfect, non-polluting manner. Fields emitted by matter are also a source of clean and abundant energy, capable of powering entire neighborhoods and cities. Devices such as N-machine they would be the kind of devices that could revolutionize technology. The biggest problem, however, is that they are too unknown and underappreciated a solution to replace traditional generators in power plants. Devices like magnetic motors of various types have become a form of internet folklore, but they are not necessarily just folklore. They utilize the energy of permanent magnets, so they are not perpetual motion machines, as they convert magnetic energy into kinetic energy in a simple way. Devices based on electromagnetic induction can also generate free energy, and they do not violate the laws of physics. Electricity is an energy whose nature is relatively well understood. However, a comprehensive understanding of the various relationships between electromagnetic fields, electricity, and magnetic fields can still be considered incomplete. Electromagnetism and its relationship to space and the vacuum is still an open question. The general situation is that one side of electromagnetic energy, one side of the "coin," has been discovered, while the other remains unknown. Despite the vacuum being considered the medium in which all physical phenomena occur, there remains a sense of dissatisfaction related to the unknown nature of space-time. The matter of the substance creating the vacuum has also been overlooked in science, completely ignored in calculations. It is usually assumed that the vacuum lacks a medium for commonly known fields. However, these assumptions have significantly influenced technology, as they have prevented the emergence of specific and distinct technological branches. The direction in which technology is currently developing is based on working against natural forces, not cooperating with them. This phenomenon creates the problem of enormous energy expenditure by civilization, which could prove unnecessary if technology were to be converted to a lighter one. By acting inconsistently, at odds with the forces of nature, and failing to utilize them appropriately for one's needs, humans are literally "destroying" the planet on which they were born. To make matters worse, the end of this process is unlikely to come anytime soon. It is true that electricity and its deficit related to the development of civilization is a fundamental problem that keeps those who would lose the most sleep at night if the continuity of civilization were to fall into ruins, if there was no voltage in sockets and factory centers. Sometimes it happens that you have to sacrifice something to survive, without sacrificing anything, none of your prosperity. This civilization aspires to return to the Stone Age.