Main aim of this web-page is gathering the proper knowledge especially to obtain better than existing methods of transport in space. Since early XX century years the science cannot work out the proper scientific base to create an efficient and enough fast method of space travel. So the recent ways of transport in space still don't allow us to crew escape out of the solar system. Also the question of related technology needed with space transport will be a topic here. It will be such a topic like extraterrestrial life sustain methods on the other planets in solar system and beyond, building civilization on solid technology elements allowing us to a real deep space exploration crew travel, not to creeping near our planet gravity field taking advantage of new inertial and centrifugal force manipulation concepts and magnetic propulsion technology methods.This web-page is oriented on technology problems, unconventional inventions and inventors. The main aim of this web-page is to collect proper knowledge and abilities to overcome technological obstacles in every crucial regions of technology and life with respect to different approach to science and technology, what is crucial and necessary for nowadays world, because recent science still can't give the answers to the main questions, so connected to this science technology still is not sufficient to obtain proper humans abilities mainly in outer space transport means and in the way we gain the electric power for industrial and life's purposes. Many inventors in the history of technological progress on Earth were completely ignored by the science. The science has developed in different directions - none of scientists hadn't propagating some important ideas, although many of controversial inventors had presented interesting solutions in various crucial technology topics. If the science has working on them till today the world could gain even fantastic technological opportunities. The lack of these opportunities now is the main obstacle to the way of the mankind to stars and is the main cause of inequalities, wars and also lack of mental balance in the world's community. Do politicians, popes, or large corporations write the story ? Well, not necessarily - it would seem that history is happening in the conference rooms wherever there is capital, which seems to determine how the world develops and it would seem that in this arrangement everything has already been planned and determined by technological and economic requirements . The future, however, belongs to everyone, it is an unknown land, which will conquer those who see more and those who know how to combine certain facts in a different way from standards, because standards can not always base something that goes beyond everyday life in technology, and yet the world is developing above all thanks to going beyond this everyday life. Thus, this web page is about the future and the way it will be determined by technology that is often pioneering, a challenge directed to the laws of nature, including the topic of space travel and their technologies and methods of astronomical observation, as well as about this standard and this physics. controversial. You will find here all the premises and topics that could affect the course of development of civilization, as well as its problems, difficulties and successes, people who stood out with the intellect in the challenges of technology and whose technological solutions are currently the basis of the functioning of civilization or those who, despite A brilliant flash of genius could not get the publicity. The subject of this web page is physics at the point of contact with technology and its borderland, the site draws from works and physics theories described as controversial. Assuming that the freedom of thought and the transmission of information is the basis in every dimension of human functioning, we have the right to improve and acquire knowledge and this site is to enable this. Freedom begins especially when the individual needs to function freely, when he or she can use the effects of their work and solutions, be it inventiveness, any other type of creativity or any creativity. Nowadays, this type of freedom is limited by ineffective technology, which has been achieved at the expense of the abandonment of technologies based on concepts that use free energy and drives not based on mass ejection. Free energy is not a fantasy or a fairy tale, this energy really exists, for example, in the form of field energy, whether magnetic or gravitational, it has an intra-atomic basis and an intrinsic character, the problem is only the right technology to acquire virtually any amount energy needed by our civilization. Without real opportunities for the free use of this type of energy for living purposes, the role of the citizen of the economic and economic system currently in force was reduced to the function of a payer whose free thought and economy was largely eliminated by this economic deal. Free thought has been harnessed in the economic machine modes, which are ruled by large groups of scientists and sponsors financing this system, and probably for this reason, so far no revolutionary breakthrough has been made, neither in transport technology nor in the energy sector. It is a reality in which we all participate, in this way we contribute to the lack of perspectives because in general the presence of a man in the space is negligible at all times. So this web-page is oriented on technology problems, unconventional inventions and inventors. The main aim of this wab-page is to collect proper knowledge and abilities to overcome technological obstacles in every crucial regions of technology and life.

It so happens that lately I've been becoming more and more of an inertial drive "theoretician"... () For several years now, as you can easily see, there's no one on the horizon or in my immediate circle who would be willing to delve into this kind of topic, apart from myself and perhaps a few other low-ranking fanatics and enthusiasts of this type of technology scattered throughout Poland (an illusory technology, as some believe, lacking any real scientific foundation). This stems from the fact that few people, especially those raised on Newton's laws of dynamics and Einstein's theory of relativity, have the courage to risk, contrary to the mainstream, promoting this type of drive, in a situation of widespread distrust of such technical solutions, which is also associated with the lack of constructive commitment from the appropriate individuals to finance specific goals and projects in this field of technology. The collective opinion is more akin to the assertion that such technology cannot and will never work in any demonstrable way. However, at the same time, opponents who hold this view cannot explain how devices such as Norman Dean's inertial drive, Thorson's inertial drive or To³czyn's inercoid work.Isn't this some kind of eye disease, or a flaw in their perception of reality, consisting in a maniacal adherence to theorems and laws, when they have long been tangibly and visibly challenged by people who have shed the uniforms of ossified academic science, and this has been considered charlatanism, a departure from the main canons, with negative consequences. Interestingly, this consequence has most affected only those professors and doyens of standard science who demonstrate the greatest obstructionism regarding the affirmation of their own approach to the scientific theory of which they are conservatives. Perhaps the approach I present is too focused on the mere attempt to prove the validity of the inertial drive assumptions without citing calculations and facts confirming these assumptions, while someone might accuse me of saying that, if this drive were not fictitious, it would already have been rationalized, and that there is no gap between science and solutions such as inertial drive. I'm not a fan of conspiracy theories and am only interested in facts and truth. No conspiracy theories apply here; that's not my approach, and I don't want to accuse current scientists and large corporations of lacking concern for the future of civilization and its well-being. However, what these people and corporations are doing indicates at least some kind of dissonance between what they declare and what ultimately finds its way into the broader technological and economic plan. This, in turn, conditions the market in general and impacts the lives of billions of people gathered on the surface of this small planet. However, there are many people around the world who recognize the potential of this type of propulsion system, who have already developed several technical solutions based on the physical phenomena occurring in inertial propulsion. I'm writing these few words because I think it's a shame that inertial propulsion is being marginalized. This propulsion method could offer fantastic technological possibilities. If, instead of replicating what has already proven ineffective and what we already know, and what we already know is not for everyone, only for a select few and perhaps those with deep pockets, we stopped believing in ineffective technologies and began working on projects that perhaps have greater potential than rockets. I wasn't the only one who recognized that the current technology couldn't satisfy me, as a technology expert, in certain respects. So I began looking for something else in the field of propulsion useful in space. My dream has always been to be able to freely travel through the universe, leaving the atmosphere and gravity of the planet I was born on. Another dream of mine has always been to develop an energy source that wouldn't depend on the amount of fuel in tanks, and to obtain energy off-planet in any quantity. It seems the world isn't heading towards a happier era, considering that everyone with a well-stocked wallet and academic degrees are gaining power, serving the current scientific and technological system. With astonishing consistency, those with technological visions are being overlooked, those who are unaffected by money and unaffected by financial depravity despite external pressures. Until the world's population wises up and chooses what will ensure the prosperity of the entire world, rather than what's popular, which serves only one purpose: the exploitation of the masses and their total consumption, the complete fiscalization of life on this planet, and the enslavement of the citizen of Earth to money, the world will continue to be ruled by violence and greed. We have the total computerization of life, and advanced electronics are almost ubiquitous. I recently found a nearly new pack of 1.44 MB floppy disks at home, which can now only be used to show off computer antiques to children. It's how DOS programs and word processor files were once stored. Times change, neighbors die... and loved ones pass away. The world is changing a lot, even too much for too many people, but I fear it's not developing in the right direction. The systems that sustain the economy and industry have absorbed far too much money without any tangible results. They've absorbed so much financial resources into their systems that they've set a difficult fate for enthusiasts of alternative drives, leaving no room for a new standard in science and technology. In the long run, this could prove to be a fatal mistake, potentially resulting in the technological bankruptcy of civilization. Is it a coincidence that, for example, millions sunk into genetic research and playing God fail to produce the intended results, or rather, disastrous consequences? Whenever something crucial is about to change in the world, or an extraordinary individual is born with the potential to change the fate of the Earth, someone intervenes and a new war or political crisis erupts, shattering the foundations of civilization. Is this also another coincidence, or a deliberate act by 7 percent of people who seek to create a world government and control the entire world's society?

The world became familiar with inertial drives many years ago, but for years, few people, or at least we don't know of them, have achieved significant success with this type of drive. For as long as human memory can remember, there hasn't been a daredevil willing to seriously challenge scientific canons who also possessed any significant economic or political position in the world. All inventors who have already achieved anything in this field have been swallowed up by the demon of modern technology and science, without the possibility of any significant protest on their part. The matter is simple: either you have the money or you don't, but it's known that most representatives of the authorities and the scientific canon are a closely knit network of interests, mutually supporting each other in order to sell technological and financial deals that have been developed over decades, even centuries. This process involved institutions and individuals not always with the best intentions for the success and well-being of civilization. Few inventors representing inertial propulsion will participate in this system for simple reasons, stemming from the simple fact that civilization has rejected the concept of inertial propulsion due to the actions of its fierce opponents, and the resulting lack of financial resources on the part of these very inventors. However, the rejection of the inertial propulsion concept contributes to humanity's technological limitations when it comes to methods of space travel, where technological advancements and the legacy of the last century have far-reaching consequences. However, if someone attempts to disrupt certain processes related to this deal, they may be discriminated against, even if their values ??are superior, and even if they were perfect, their actions would not influence the actions of the establishment controlling the technological civilization we currently face. This is what civilization and progress are all about, as interpreted by post-Newtonian and post-Einsteinian representatives of science, who shovel unnecessary knowledge into their students' heads. Progress is still hard to come by, as nothing changes in these key technological hubs except the rapid computerization of industry through artificial intelligence, which may do us more harm than good. Science, which relies on observation, drawing conclusions, learning from mistakes, and reading the universe, ends when big money is involved. The impact of this kind of principle has already had consequences for the actions of almost all types of scientists. Therefore, science itself has been betrayed many times in its original ideals. Perhaps I am justified in believing that it is not scientists who will change the world for the better, at least not the scientists who invented this civilization based on burning and wasting resources. In this situation, for a person who would like to suffer the least in the general power struggle conducted at the higher levels of civilization by people aspiring to be owners of this world, without any significant respect for the truth, because it has been verified by income, which constantly limits his possibilities of action, the best option is a sense of intuition and independent thinking, consisting in sticking to one's own opinion, because science has been corrupted, just like power and politics, and the path of an honest person is most often dominated by the actions of people without principles, who have technological means at their disposal and will use them to preserve the order that suits them only, whenever the need arises and whenever society or smaller groups of individuals begin to represent different values. The technology and science that are widely available ignore many simple technological connotations and seem to defy common sense, ignoring facts, through a false need to maintain the cohesion of the scientific community and limit the actions of those who have the potential to transcend the fundamental barriers of modern science and technology. This could undermine the foundations of power and control over the world held by those currently at the top of the civilizational pyramid in terms of income and technological capabilities. The current education system is a failure. A particularly flawed aspect of the modern education system is the mass production of scientists and engineers characterized by the same technical and scientific principles; this lack of differentiation is the final nail in the coffin of the current higher education system. When I speak of inertial propulsion, a prime example that teaches us the impotence and incompleteness of modern science, I am referring to the technological breakthrough so needed in transportation, especially space travel. Starting with centrifugal force, so relegated to oblivion by such serious scientists, where science is devoid of diverse opinions, as in other cases. However, centrifugal force is not a fictitious force; it is as real as nuclear or electromagnetic interactions, and it is a force unrelated to a system of forces, similar to the Lorentz force and precessional forces in the operation of a gyroscope. The claim that centrifugal force is an illusory force is a distortion of reality, likely due to scientists' lack of thorough understanding of the nature of inertia and gravity, and above all, the phenomenon of space itself. All the phenomena described have their source in the nature of space and are derived from it. Matter and the laws of physics are linked to the properties of space and its fundamental substance, or, in more scientific terms, the Higgs field. Maintaining the fictitiousness of centrifugal force leads to numerous paradoxes, which many scientists attempt to deprecate and suppress. For example, the common belief that the center of mass cannot be displaced by any internal force, only by the application of an external force, is utter nonsense. Centrifugal force acts from within, allowing the center of mass to shift without the application of external force. Here I'm getting to the heart of the matter: jet and rocket propulsion, which derive their essence from these principles, and it's impossible to explain to any scientist that these propulsion systems lead to a technological dead end.

Life on Earth is associated with specific consequences, both in terms of demand for specific goods and the effects of our own activities. People need food, clean water, space, appropriate thermal conditions, and so on. In search of these goods, we, as humans, will have to look beyond the planet once demand reaches a critical level related to demographics and the industry we create, along with the global economy. The world's resources are being depleted at a rapid pace, which is not slowing down but accelerating almost exponentially. Already at the turn of the 20th century, space pioneers such as K. Tsiolkovsky and R. Goddard, and later W. von Braun, demonstrated the type of technology that enabled us to take our first steps in near-space exploration. These were the foundations of liquid-fueled rocket flight technology. To this day, the technological situation regarding near-Earth exploration has not changed dramatically; rocket transport remains the only means of transporting cargo and crews into Earth orbit or to the Moon. No other form of space transport has yet been invented that could spread as rapidly around the world as rocket propulsion. Rocket propulsion, in all its varieties, including those using small nuclear explosions, is the same propulsion used by the Chinese, who invented black powder during the early Chinese era. It is the same principle of propulsion based on Newton's laws of motion, the principle of action and reaction. As a rocket vehicle burns fuel, it creates pressure on one side, which pushes it in the opposite direction according to the laws of motion. Everything is clear and straightforward here. Unfortunately, I must disappoint some people: there are no fuel stations in space to replenish this fuel after it has been used up in the rocket's tanks. After launch, a rocket will only travel as far as the fuel in the tanks refueled before launch. This fact contributes to the well-known limitations of current forms of human space exploration on planet Earth. Therefore, anyone wishing to venture a little further must consider radically different forms of transportation. There are many such forms. For example, there are inertial propulsion, gravity (antigravity), magnetic (electromagnetic, magnetostrictive), electrokinetic (electrodynamic, electrostatic, magnetoelectrodynamic), electrogravity, telekinetic, and warp propulsion. However, these propulsion systems are not currently officially developed and are even considered fictional, with progress occurring on Earth primarily in electronics, medicine, and nuclear technology. These propulsion systems are not being developed primarily due to the lack of a theoretical basis for their implementation, and above all, the lack of a theoretical basis authorizing scientists to research them. This does not mean that these propulsion systems do not exist. However, if these forms of propulsion are considered non-fictional and real, only distant in the future, then the types of propulsion mentioned here do not rely on fuel combustion or rocket thrust. These are propulsion systems that generate propulsion fields or use their own mass, or a portion of their mass, to generate propulsion. This occurs, for example, through rotation or other forms of cyclic mass displacement within the vehicle or in engines adapted for this purpose to propel it through space. The power source, which is usually separate from the propulsion source, is usually antimatter reactors, thermonuclear fusors, miniaturized fusion tokamaks, magnetic generators, or the nuclear reactors already known to our technology. The first type of propulsion system I mentioned is inertial propulsion, meaning a propulsion system that utilizes the forces of inertia, inertia, and centrifugal force to propel itself through space. Common in everyday life, these forces make their existence known to us constantly; they are present in our lives at all times because they are related to the properties of space and matter?the matter from which the human body, like the world around us, is also woven. Inertial propulsion is a propulsion system that does not rely on rocket thrust, and no mass is oxidized or irretrievably lost upon exiting a spacecraft. This is the first form, and at the same time the simplest, of propulsion, one that humans could immediately adopt if their civilization were to adapt its operating methods to those more appropriate to the needs of the solar system's dimensions, not to mention the universe's. It is a simple form and a prelude to the colonization of the solar system, thanks to which the complete colonization and assimilation of Mars would take only a few decades, perhaps a hundred years. This generation could already utilize the red planet's resources to a degree unimaginable by implementing the same endeavor using rocket technology alone. The weight of the mass in inertial drive systems is obtained by its rotation in inertial generators and is given by centrifugal force, which is equivalent to generating the appropriate gravitational force by planetary conditions, which roughly comes down to the fact that there is a positive and non-zero pressure on the part of the system transferring kinetic energy, as opposed to the part where this energy is dissipated or smaller. It is a simple system operating similarly to a wing, which is affected by aerodynamic force as it moves in the atmospheric medium, only to create the pressure difference it is not the air but a special asymmetric rotor or another system for spatial orientation of masses. Thanks to this, when the inertial pressure, at an appropriate rotor rotation speed, exceeds the force of universal gravity in the gravitational field acting on the same object, it is possible for an inertial-inertial propulsion vehicle to lift off from the ground and continue its flight in space. The difference in pressure from the masses on the transfer structure can also be achieved by using different speeds of movement of these masses around the suspension point. It is easy to see that inertial propulsion is effective both in planetary environments (water, air, on the ground) and in space. It is the first type of space-class propulsion not relying on rocket thrust, with such capabilities requiring further investigation, and feasible under current material and technological conditions. Another propulsion method is gravity or antigravity propulsion. This is a more difficult space-class propulsion to achieve, and its forerunner is the T.T. Brown, who noticed that Coolidge's tube (early work on X-ray tubes) behaved in a strange way: the positive electrode tended to move toward the negative electrode. This phenomenon, it turned out, could be exploited in the construction of gravitators, devices capable of converting electric current into gravitational force, which could be directed vertically upward to create thrust counter to the Earth's gravitational field. In modern times, Bell likely used Brown's work to construct a prototype rotorless, bladeless gravity-propelled helicopter. However, this type of technology was deemed too expensive, and further development of this type of vehicle was abandoned. Another form of gravity propulsion, or more appropriately, antigravity, is propulsion using cool mercury plasma or a rotating and levitating superconducting disk. Apparently, the US military still possesses this type of technology and triangular-shaped vehicles, such as the TR-3B, which was repeatedly observed over the military base at Area 51, where a toroidal beam of cool mercury plasma was used for propulsion. Another propulsion system is magnetic propulsion, which utilizes the magnetic properties of matter or the properties of the magnetic and electromagnetic fields themselves. A long time ago, I encountered an interesting variant involving the ultrafast pulsation of two interlocking magnetic fields from two electromagnets separated by a non-interfering field. The required field frequency for this solution was in the picosecond range, i.e., perhaps one billionth of a second. Even today, no electromagnet used in industry or technology is capable of achieving such rapid magnetic field pulsation, which is likely related to the properties of electric current, core magnetization, and conductor. These requirements, as one might assume, are related to the very high speed of magnetic field propagation in space, i.e., approximately 300,000 km/s, which is equal to the speed of light in space (all fields known to science propagate at the speed of light). If it were possible to induce such a rapid magnetic field pulse using a method other than electromagnets, for example, by using a vacuum or other medium without the constraints of electromagnets instead of copper or silver wire, perhaps this technology could be brought closer to realization in the future.