What's happening in technology today is nothing more than a turbulent civilizational development, which, frankly, outpaces spirituality. There are always more questions, and they're a step ahead of the answers. However, if humans ever manage to master the technology that enables civilization to expand beyond the solar system, and humans achieve complete control over their surroundings and the biology of their own bodies, what role will ethics and religion play for humans in such circumstances? Are we not, unwittingly, creating our own technologically based religion, whether we want to or not? The question of the limits of reason's interference with matter and its physical foundations is a question of the extent to which we have the right to interfere with something we know and interact with daily, and at the same time, it is a question of the limits of interference with the established order and harmony of the universe. What people will encounter when they are allowed to leave their homelands remains beyond substantive discussion for now. Today, we no longer question many of the issues we once feared and that have become commonplace. Religion no longer leads to such blatant displays of religious fundamentalism as it did in the times of Copernicus, Galileo, or other scientists forced to recant their beliefs based on valid data and the correct conclusions drawn from them. Today, religion serves more as a moral framework and allows for a certain degree of freedom of interpretation, not clinging to dogma. Past experience has taught us that knowledge and faith are fluid and can be interpreted differently, which can sometimes lead different people to different conclusions. Although the knowledge contained in the teachings of faith, addressed to members of various institutions, including the Church, need not be subject to any particular pressure from those who base their reasoning on the observation and analysis of nature from a strictly mathematical perspective, certain solutions contained in this knowledge have inevitably lost their original character and are currently perceived by society at large in a different way, less oriented toward strict and literal adherence to certain canons and truths contained within them. Revision has already addressed many issues, but what we are dealing with is only the beginnings of human civilization, and it is currently in a phase of limited perception. Therefore, it is too early to accurately and unequivocally determine the direction of its development, and thus the shape of morality defined by specific principles that currently seem immutable. Once humans achieve control over natural processes in biology and physics, which are fundamental to the foundations of life on Earth and which currently lead to inevitable changes in living organisms, boiling down to the law of matter and energy circulation in nature, they will likely begin to interpret matters related to the degradation of life differently, and intra-social relations and the perception of the universe will change, with humans no longer being a component of an ecosystem serving the law of energy circulation throughout the cosmos. This could likely lead to the crystallization of new systems of consciousness, commensurate with the knowledge humans have gained. The question of whether this will lead to a new form of religion or a new form of atheism is currently difficult to answer, but it is likely that both will evolve in parallel, with the former being more oriented toward the spiritual and the latter toward the material, with both being more focused on the pursuit of truth and less on dogma. The future of human civilization is likely to be shaped by the interplay between these two forces, with technology serving as a catalyst for change and evolution in both realms.

A few observations on the ideological attitudes of various people who use the terms religion or atheism, of one kind or another, are offered here. Throughout history, humanity has been forced to draw on available knowledge from its surroundings, which, for obvious reasons, applied only to the area of ??the planet it inhabits. In fact, the data received from celestial observations were essentially ineffective for much else beyond calendars and primitive navigation. What could not be studied experimentally or through other cognitive methods was known only from information provided top-down by certain institutions and individuals (shamans, prophets, and other individuals representing specific religious systems, often of high moral standing). Although some people were able to observe certain processes and phenomena in their surrounding reality, both near and far, they still failed to correctly interpret the data they received. Even today, despite technological and scientific progress, the amount of knowledge still to be learned is enormous. The conclusion that emerges is that religion, atheism?that is, a lack of belief in the supernatural and higher beings?can be interpreted as a form of religion based on science and logic. All these and other ideological positions depend primarily on humanity's current level of knowledge about reality and nature, and the healthiest form of knowledge is the pursuit of the most essential truth, not limitations. Most ideological positions seem to depend less on a person's personal declaration, because due to the lack of essential information that can elevate any ideology, regardless of its moral standing, there is no coherence between the perceived world and objective truth. This depends more on the capacity of perception and level of consciousness than on even the most fanatical stance. In this situation, as self-awareness and technology advance, matters of ideology based on any religious system may also begin to evolve towards higher spheres of the psyche and may concern higher regions of human consciousness, while atheism and skepticism as such may evolve towards an increasingly materially coarse ideology, which will occur despite increasingly sophisticated and accessible technology in the future, all the while remaining in the sphere of expanded logic... whereas no humanistic values are in conflict with either the religious system or skepticism, and these very values will probably be spread wherever man reaches in the future, regardless of the fact that from the moral side this process will sometimes be threatened, and other ideologies will continue to evolve in different directions...

The blind cannot lead the blind... Unable to find respite from economic problems and other troubles, for so many years controlled by successive "possessors of a miracle elixir," for whom politics was an arena used to finance constant partying at the expense of society, instead of serving society, for which they were intended, they did nothing too spectacular, striving only for their own prosperity. This society cannot continue to remain without some major success... otherwise, national frustration and more and more acts of desperation in Polish newspapers and on the streets are becoming a common effect... Every now and then, new players appear on the political scene who claim to have made a revolution,...we gave you bread, we build you apartments, we provide cheap medicine and money, we keep our election promises, etc. However, leaving aside the fact that human life is short and some will probably not live to see the fulfillment of some of these promises, it seems that none of these politicians has probably seriously considered what will happen when we finally achieve... the nation, this actual level of universal prosperity and abundance of goods..., which, considering the history of Poland, can be doubted, where every time it seemed that we were emerging from a crisis, another tragedy occurred..., the imagination of politicians seems to run out again... On the other hand, it is a great tragedy that the lack of something in the nation forces the standard Pole to walk in the same "shoes" throughout his life. The lack of coordination and lack of success, we are talking about success with a capital 'S' in the nation, seems to be caused by something, perhaps by the low self-awareness of society - it seems that the majority does not want any other inspirations than those currently functioning, afraid of changes, for fear of not being able to adapt to them, constantly needing various "possessors of panaceas" to exist, and it must be noted that in fact there is only one reality happening here and now, the future does not exist yet, because it is being created by all the individuals on Earth and it will only take the shape we allow it to, because man has been gifted with free will in an unconditional and perfect way, for this plan to work, we have the entire cosmos at our disposal, not limited to this one world, despite this, it is increasingly difficult in the Polish reality to focus on reality, to get to the specifics and use the consequences of this knowledge in practice... some can do it, often others act without far-sighted imagination or, worse still, they implement a "predictable and standard plan" that sets a strict horizon for modern knowledge, not allowing for the spread of wings, which lacks a specific a technological bridge to change the monotony and consequences stemming from the past for the descendants of primitive people who find themselves in a reality limited to their own consciousness conditions, which, as we know, leads to all the limitations that civilization cannot cope with yet... Although Poland is still a country in the making, we could certainly be much closer to prosperity and economic success if this country were not ravaged by various occupiers, invaders and the inappropriate policies of successive authorities. Then we could develop our own advanced, comprehensive program, we could produce energy for our own needs in a much more effective and easier way than nuclear energy provides... we could have technologies better than the American F-35 and SpaceX rockets, because nothing is achieved in the long term by being guided by the principles of the common good at the expense of proper planning, and this cannot entail giving up long-term actions that, while they will not pay off until a certain level is reached, will contribute to gaining access to resources and opportunities that no one on Earth has even dreamed of. Especially in the face of challenges and the associated technological barriers, once overcome, the technological leap can be enormous. This technological leap is vital for everyone, even before breakthroughs in artificial intelligence occur. It will be essential for this generation and the next, which will have more advanced methods for civilization's functioning. The problem is that the current political class, which has been in power for so long, has no vision for the future, and it seems that they are not even trying to have one, because they are too focused on their own short-term interests and the interests of their supporters, which is a great tragedy for the nation. The lack of vision and the lack of success in achieving it is a problem that needs to be addressed urgently, as it is leading to a growing sense of frustration and hopelessness among the population, which can have dangerous consequences for the stability of the country and its future development.

The desire of society in the capitalist system to possess, as such, is unfortunately the basis for the functioning of the capitalist system. Without it, the system would cease to function. However, the possible lack of a sufficient quantity of goods, or on the other hand, the lack of purchasing power on the part of the consumer, always sooner or later leads to a crisis. Even in highly developed countries, this problem is significant, because although the primary needs are satisfied, prosperity is for some a stagnation that is difficult to bear in the long term, hence the frequent search for some source of emotion that is in conflict with the environment. Democracy is a system in which everything is permissible, provided it has an economic justification. The only problem is the amount of money to support a given initiative, which from a substantive point of view may be complete nonsense. However, as long as it is a profitable venture, it will be supported, even despite the marginalization of other better ideas, which will inevitably be underfunded, whether in technology or the economy. This system becomes a de facto deformed capitalism devalued into the dictatorship of a monetary system that, instead of helping, makes life difficult in the long run, mainly through administrative systems that want to administer mainly those individuals who cannot effectively defend themselves against it within the law. In this system, the realities of the free market and the laws in force in the economy do not serve utilitarian purposes, but only constitute an obstacle course for the senseless enrichment of those who use their wealth in a nonsensical and short-sighted way. I fear that we are still far from the sustainable and harmonious development of these appropriate and essential technologies, which will not rob us of our financial resources, but will actually promote everyone individually, provided they possess positive potential, and ensure the existence of masses of people without having to grapple with daily problems or stumble over the economic threshold set by the demands of an economy set on short legs, whose foundation is retirees and the middle class, the most economically exploited. What is unfair and strange, however, is that the lower the economic status of the entities to be exploited, the more their exploitation will intensify. A parallel conclusion is that a person driven by the desire for possession is precisely the best target for the "system" to control. Others, who have the potential to spiral out of control, are not "synchronized" with the "mechanisms," and fail to achieve their goals due to a lack of access to the appropriate resources needed to achieve them, due to a lack of complementarity with this polarized system, created by the "visionaries"?the "fathers" of the modern economic battlefield?"fueled" by money. All these economists, proponents of various concepts intended for rationalization on the living body of society, test their theories for free, as if in a laboratory, working not on a cure but on something counterproductive in action. Despite this, the results often fail to meet expectations. Governments come one after another, and what their predecessors ruined later becomes a means of creating political advantage for the current government. However, the realities do not change much and do not significantly translate into the opportunities of the average citizen. Due to a lack of far-reaching imagination, the entire system remains largely unchanged. Currently, the technology available on Earth lacks the resources to realize any bold technological dreams that go beyond established scientific frameworks, and this situation won't improve anytime soon, as interest is negligible everywhere. However, in this case, the true and actual determinant of a civilization's technological development is precisely the ability to pursue space exploration. This exposes all the technological problems that a fledgling civilization cannot cope with, thus remaining immobilized in its own "home" or "cradle," failing to understand or perceive the significant external order and principles surrounding it. Unfortunately, technologically advanced technology available on Earth, which serves no significant benefit to anyone, has been and continues to be all too often harnessed to the cogs of the arms and military industry. For as long as memory can remember, the battlefield has been the place where it was simultaneously tested and improved, and the military sector has often been the main investor in many key areas of the military industry, leading to its excessive growth. Analyzing the history of conflict on Earth, one can see that humanity can no longer "endure" without some minor or major "turmoil" and constantly seeks conflict. Unfortunately, neither stable prosperity nor any other form of currently available happiness can dissuade it from its constant pursuit of self-destruction. Conflict has long had various ideological underpinnings, whether it's about religious principles, control over a specific region of the world, the seizure of key strategic assets, or simply the simple need to conquer and conquer. It seems that for some members of our civilization, conflict is the foundation of their actions and reasoning. Some conflicts stem from the nature of people who strive for every form of conflict and aggression, whether based on religious beliefs or manifestations of intolerance for any other form of action or behavior. We will probably have to wait a long time until the multi-threaded conflict of all its forms is eliminated, so that the representatives and followers of the "international law of the jungle", not separately but together, begin to speak with one voice and not just for fun on behalf of all those people ruled by the followers of a law that has nothing in common with law, because it serves some and eliminates others.

Space propulsion is no ordinary propulsion system in the realities dictated by planetary conditions. If a civilization's technological advancement is measured by its ability to move through space, then propulsion systems capable of moving in a vacuum are an excellent indicator. Another aspect of technology that determines a civilization's level of advancement is the amount of energy consumed by a given civilization over a given period of time. However, these two determinants share a direct correlation. The only other determinant that depends on adaptability, measured by intelligence in spacecraft construction, which designers gain through the process of evolution within their own planet, is the inherent capacity for expansion, where the aforementioned intelligence seems to play a crucial role. Superintelligent designers have long since left their solar system, or at least they lack the limitations in space travel typical of designers commonly known to the international public on Earth. Less intelligent inhabitants of planets, wherever resources needed for interstellar trade and the exchange of goods are found, are unwitting participants in their exploitation by those constructors for whom the barriers of vast interstellar distances no longer pose a significant problem. Humanity has focused on limitations, not on the possibilities already demonstrated by many visionary constructors. Where attention should have been paid by the right people, certain technologies have been completely relegated to the margins of science and technology. This unfavorable phenomenon is further compounded by a specific set of economic ties. Otherwise, the current system would not have lasted very long if it weren't for the enormous sums of money and the interests of people greedy for Earth's resources. One cannot help but feel that the development of space exploration in its current form is facing such serious difficulties these days because the enormous amounts of money directed towards the construction of increasingly powerful rockets are all a sham, intended to conceal the true picture of events and justify the ruthless exploitation of our home planet in order to implement new forms of slavery of the inhabitants of Earth and maintain technological superiority on it by counterfeiters who pull the wool over the eyes of billions of people, saying that there is no other technology, because for this or that scientific reason something is possible or impossible. These words, despite everything, are supported by reality, because let's consider how enslaved humans are, playing the role of pawns in the hands of fuel, energy, and media corporations on Earth, and how dependent they are on energy carriers, chemicals, and many everyday things without which life is impossible. In the past, humans weren't as entangled in everything as they are now. Life didn't require as much, and they were content with a technologically less advanced environment, which meant they were closer to nature, which had its advantages and disadvantages. However, they were certainly healthier and mentally stronger in many respects than today's computerized and cybernetic humans. Until someone is presented with new possibilities, not necessarily those that positively impact their development, they will remain unaware of them and happy with what they have. It's okay that progress is occurring, but some of the positive functions associated with human life in a changing environment are being permanently relegated to oblivion. We gain new opportunities with the development of civilization, but the changes we observe increasingly raise concerns about their direction, as they appear to be depraving both the intellectual sphere (overly absorbing intellectual abilities and preventing rest) and the emotional sphere. Humans need success and a space free from pollution, expressed as what they don't need. We don't need to clutter our surroundings, but we do it all the time. Ever since we acquired the ability and need for exploration, we dream of conquering new living spaces, despite the fact that we can't maintain order in our own backyards. This is where our fascination with the unknown comes from. However, considering the hundreds of light-years separating us from the adventure of new worlds, one might conclude that humanity currently has no choice but to focus on such inhospitable planets as Mars or Venus, available within our own solar system. We won't develop suitable propulsion systems quickly, as progress has entered a phase of regression, verified by economics and the science of Einstein's and Newton's laws, and so on. This is happening even as we enter the next century, and more and more people are disappointed by the poor quality of knowledge acquired in schools. What is most interesting and fascinating is currently scientific apocryphal, and access to this information is limited by the media and devalued by the correspondingly evasive propaganda of current technologies by their distributors. The global situation is dire regarding the status of new propulsion systems, and any unconventional ideas have not yet gained significant traction. It must be acknowledged that current methods of duplicating information and processing available technologies will not yield key solutions capable of changing the current state of affairs in space technology. The technology remains dangerous, and colonization of adjacent planets on a large scale using rocket propulsion is still impossible. It's concerning that a significant portion of the market has been taken over by people who refuse to acknowledge this fact and are relentlessly pursuing it, despite not fully mastering the available technology. A lot of money doesn't necessarily guarantee success, and the inability to survey the technological landscape and draw conclusions can be costly...

For some time now, progress on our planet has been manifested as economic and technological growth in almost every industry. The greatest progress seems to be occurring in the semiconductor industry and everyday devices based on them. Another manifestation of this rapid progress is the current advancement in medicine, pharmacy, and chemistry. All this means that new horizons of possibilities, previously unavailable, seem to be opening up for our civilization. Most of these processes are global in nature. However, progress is not for everyone, especially not for those who simply cannot afford it, and it is not happening only in the poorest countries. Zones of interest and areas of poverty, where new opportunities clash with acute deprivation, still present themselves in a way that realistically indicates that this same civilization supports processes that disharmonize global development, especially its balanced and sustainable course. Although many laboratories around the world are working on breakthrough technologies that could be crucial to the development of civilization, it is important to remember that once a technological path is chosen, there are consequences. Each new direction set by modern researchers and scientists automatically eliminates other, sometimes better, technological solutions of equal or greater importance, developed by teams with less clout and less funding. Every action has its consequences; the current consequence of the progress being served up by scientists worldwide is a closure to true physics, which provides a broader technological landscape. Some people fail to grasp the gravity of the situation regarding specific technologies and misinterpret their nature. All of this has a significant impact on the extreme poverty of the planet's inhabitants, where several billion Earthlings still live in conditions below the biological minimum. What good is it that space technologies are being developed in some countries? First, let's address the high cost of sending infrastructure and people into space; then we will have the resources to help the poorest, rather than forcefully pushing the rocket industry. This asymmetric development prevents us from achieving a uniform economic level and, consequently, providing access to all the benefits of modern civilization for all. Something has been omitted here, and that something is justice in a general sense, which is in vain where economics determines the conditions in which someone will live, even what they will believe in and what their future will be. This seems obvious, but when it comes to such dependence on money, their freedom is in fact limited to strict materialism. Yet, this situation can be remedied quite quickly. This would be the case if the global economy could assimilate precisely these "cursed technologies that defy Newtonian dynamics," and if the people within its sphere would look at the situation on Earth, and above all, if, instead of game theory, they would listen for a moment to their own intuition and the consequences stemming from considering the true needs of civilization and its drivers, which are ordinary people. Otherwise, a civilization based on current realities may lose the right to survive beyond the availability of natural resources, or even survive until they are completely depleted. All the technological changes currently being praised in the media are purely cosmetic. The fundamentals must be changed immediately to enjoy significant and lasting results. We must consider abandoning energy production from heavy elements and radioactive methods of electricity generation. We must end the burning of hydrocarbons and the burning of billions of tons of coal each year, thus poisoning each other. Instead, we must look toward clean energy from fields?magnetic and gravitational?i.e., the energy fields available on Earth. We must develop electrical engineering and technologies based on the application of magnetic fields, inertia, and gravity in transportation technology. Adding yet another patch to existing technology will prolong the period of environmental degradation and the disintegration of the foundations of civilization for several hundred years, without leading to any tangible results. If this is neglected, we should expect that the dominance of money will drag civilization into ever-increasing technological complexities, with one technology being created against another, solely to ensure that the planet's resources can sustain life on Earth for a few, or even a dozen, years longer. All because good technologies have been rejected as detrimental to the economic interests of certain elites. It should be noted that although most physicists are aware of the fundamental paradoxes that physics cannot explain, their stubborn stance and the arguments they use to discredit what they cannot explain may lead to the collapse of their logic and the cause-effect continuity of their knowledge. This will prevent us from understanding the workings of the universe or discovering the essential truth about it over the coming centuries. It is physicists and related scientists who define the way we understand reality, and our perception of it depends on the way and direction in which they present data about the surrounding world. This is what future generations will learn in schools, and this knowledge will function in their interactions with reality. To realistically contemplate interstellar or intergalactic travel, our scientists will have to create a completely new, entirely different physics, because the one we have is useless. Those scientists or researchers who have truly become enamored with the knowledge they have acquired are likely unaware of the true picture of reality on a broad scale. They oscillate between the theory of relativity and its paradoxes, whirling around within their own scientific framework and perception of reality, seeing no way beyond this theory, which is as useful in long-range space exploration as a bicycle is in intergalactic travel. They are obliged by their own knowledge to reject anything that contradicts it. However, truth exists, and the fundamental knowledge based on it contradicts what has already been accepted as axiomatic, hence the constant emergence of new scientific paradoxes. These paradoxes are inconsistencies that cannot be eliminated within modern physics, as it is likely founded on the wrong foundations. Attempting to patch up its fundamental theories is like patching up old trousers, but it achieves nothing because they are already too worn out. The perception of modern science and scientists may seem highly selective; they perceive and speculate about black holes, but in their own backyards, they struggle to address basic technical problems?mathematical knowledge does not always go hand in hand with imagination, nor imagination with vision and intuition. The capabilities of contemporary technology have been limited by fundamental errors in the chosen directions of development, which slow down progress; these are blind paths leading astray. On the one hand, we have the arduous task of understanding the genome and biology of living organisms to create more effective therapies. We have drones that can only fly for a mere 30 minutes before recharging. We also have graphene, which is supposed to revolutionize industry, but somehow nothing comes of it, as if the fear of displacing old but still profitable technologies is blocking work. Another, equally fundamental, drawback is the lack of electrical energy storage. We still only have the ability to generate and consume it in real time within a centrally-developed electricity distribution and generation system. This is a significant hurdle that, once again, thousands of research institutes around the world are unable to cope with, despite receiving vast research funding from their governments, supported by masses of unfortunate taxpayers. Something that was economically supported on a global scale has caused Earth to stray from its proper development path. People who think differently have been disqualified by those who shout loudly, and at the same time, to the detriment of civilization, those with capital, limited by fossil fuels and other highly inefficient technologies. This is quite visible, but it is truly a great civilizational tragedy unfolding before our eyes, one that unfortunately cannot be dismantled, especially not by people who are aligned with the system and the balance of power on Earth. How many more generations will this flawed machine consume, without giving them the opportunity to escape the penal colony that Earth has become for humanity, where, driven to work by the masters of this world with whips, they must toil until death? No one knows. This monolith is likely set up for many years to come, with the disobedient oppressed and tortured economically and legally without mercy. Anything that is inconsistent with Newtonian motion dynamics or thermodynamics is condemned and cursed by modern science. And precisely those technologies based on everything that modern science has cursed could significantly impact technological breakthroughs, for example, in transportation, and thus increase human living standards. Current transportation within the Earth is expensive, and its capabilities don't even allow for a full orbit of the Earth on a single fuel supply, with some exceptions, such as solar- and battery-powered vehicles. Aid to the poorest is contingent upon the impossibility of delivering hundreds of thousands of tons of food wasted in wealthy countries to countries suffering from food shortages. This wasted food ends up in alarming quantities in landfills, leading to the proliferation of insects and rodents on a frightening scale, while demand from poor countries increases. There are more of these civilizational shortcomings, such as: energy waste in industry is reaching monstrous levels, industrial production often operates at a few percent efficiency, and unused energy is dissipated outside the industrial process, exceeding 50% of the energy value of that process. One might ask whether to remain optimistic, suggesting that despite everything, technological civilization on Earth will overcome its difficulties through the evolution of existing technologies, or whether to attempt to develop a technology based on a different, diametrically opposed physics, even if this is extremely difficult, and rationalizing such a technology becomes impossible due to the resistance of hard scientific "concrete" and social inertia. Certain facts in the process of civilizational progress point to the need for a radical change in technology, but will this be enough to guarantee a future for billions of people who, more or less consciously or unconsciously, increasingly seem to be seeking something other than their ordinary, monotonous existence on Earth? If, along with technological possibilities, including the free possibility of travel in extra-planetary space available to everyone, the awareness of the general public could expand to a degree that would enable them to understand their own position in reality, taking into account not only their own planet but also the entire universe, then the propaganda and disinformation broadcast in the media, especially the tons of unnecessary information that takes away the average inhabitant of Earth's precious time for self-fulfilment, feeding them with information noise so that they become susceptible to all kinds of manipulation, would have a smaller field of influence on the human individual, which would result in the liberation of modern man from all forms of economic oppression, faulty legal regulations and incorrectly interpreted various types of religions and moral precepts, which are another form of influence exerted by certain individuals on society, and this is simply about the interests of certain circles and factions existing in the world, which distances people from knowing the truth about their actual situation in the cosmos. A characteristic and significant fact here is that faith, as a form of illusory knowledge, does not equal knowledge, because it assumes a sphere that cannot be known, and therefore allows for arbitrary interpretation within a certain range. It is hermetic, meaning its axioms cannot be changed, as they rely on faith, not knowledge. Knowledge can be shaped freely depending on intellectual level. Anyone privy to its closed framework can speak about faith's canons, and this does not necessarily lead to intellectual or moral advancement, against the will of some. Paradoxes and ambiguities abound, because knowledge of humanity's past on Earth is incomplete, and knowledge of the surrounding reality is filtered by the consciousness and cognitive capabilities of the general population inhabiting our planet. Despite the fact that existence on Earth, where few achieve self-fulfillment without exceeding the standard, accepted level of spiritual and intellectual development, most often ends abruptly and without the acceptance of most of us, some people still see no need for or show any interest in any technological leap that would break this vicious circle, especially if it affects certain safe areas of their peaceful existence or compromises priorities such as access to food, housing, and utilities. It's true that unless we control events on our own planet, there's no point in even thinking about venturing outside our own neighborhoods. Nowadays, there are no technologies based on closed energy cycles that don't require external energy supplies, and even those that rely on external energy supplies or utilize nuclear energy, contradicting the principles of contemporary scientific thinking. This leads to such a flattening of ideology and methodology, and a dulling of technology, that it's striking in its clarity and helplessness in the face of real needs, in terms of the usefulness of specific techniques for any more beneficial use. The principle of conservation of energy is a firm scientific dogma according to it, no energy can be created from nothing or disappear completely, but it can transform into another. But what about the interference of electromagnetic waves with opposite phases? Thus, there is a certain inconsistency here, and some facts contradict others. Considering another example, for example, the occurrence of spontaneous phenomena, such as magnetic fields, gravitational fields, and electric charge, in this case we are dealing with field energy that does not require any external energy input. Once we begin to absorb it, it replenishes automatically, as seen in many devices based on magnetism and gravity. The energy of elementary particles also does not require external energy input; a positive charge is positive, a negative charge is negative. The existence of matter is a spontaneous phenomenon, so once again it becomes clear that there are scientific and technological facts that science cannot explain using knowledge based on modern physics. Realizing that the fundamental and most essential truth about reality will not be discovered if science continues on its current course is a fundamental and generally required necessity in this situation. Creating models, attempting to explain some regularity in matter and the interactions of fields and matter, can be nothing more than a selective view of reality, determined by one's own perception, which allows only a certain fragment to be perceived; the broader reality remains elusive in this case.

Since the early 1950s, we have possessed highly advanced and devastating weapons of mass destruction. The hydrogen bomb?an invention capable of wreaking havoc on an unprecedented scale on Earth's ecosystem?is not the only weapon humanity possesses. Nuclear energy may represent humanity's hope for a virtually endless supply of energy for civilization's development. Atomic energy, however, represents a technology based on atomic fusion and fission, which effectively implies a crude and crude approach to energy production. However, in terms of technological advancement, the use of nuclear energy has not yet been fully mastered, and incidents where this type of technology spirals out of control are quite common. The approach to energy production and the real needs of all types of transportation, where high energies or even lower energies may be necessary, but with a greater emphasis on the technology itself, may, and likely does, deviate from the possibilities existing in nature, which science encounters daily, but fails to understand or perceive their mechanisms, and thus cannot correctly interpret correlated data. Known realities stemming from the properties of the surrounding physical world will not provide a solution to this impasse here either, as they do not suggest solutions, but merely describe a certain truth about the cosmos. Quite often, we encounter truths we cannot properly interpret; all too often, we fail to understand certain events that have a decisive impact on us and our surroundings.For several generations, life on Earth has not changed significantly in its fundamentals. This fact may be disturbing, but it also raises questions about the cause of this situation. However, from time to time, things happen unplanned by science and physicists, things that could not have happened otherwise than by chance. Many people working on various topics deviated from the standards and the general and current trends in their research, yet for one reason or another, their solutions did not have a significant impact on the larger human community. Certain goals, defined by civilizational needs, were achieved by entering through a different door, and instead of directly addressing specific issues, more time had to pass before the situation was successful. Sometimes, however, what is interesting is not what happens where the technological and scientific noise is greatest, because precisely in this area we are able to clearly interpret the future, and the technological premises that define it are transparent. Some solutions have fallen into ruins, work on them has been discontinued because theory failed to predict certain consequences, or matters have become economically complicated when crucial issues that would have facilitated further work were overlooked. However, the vision of a long-buried technology persists to this day, and new ideas are emerging in the minds of many, and with advances in materials and automation, they are becoming increasingly realistic. Some attempts to harness the potential of such work on dream technologies may have real implications for the direction of the world's development. Research on energy sources, such as energy generated from a vacuum, as a result of electrical processes, or utilizing matter or fields whose nature and mechanisms are unclear, may be subject to criticism, but their effectiveness is now often apparent. Such devices include electrochemical and electrical engineering devices, such as specific cells or energy amplifiers, whose power sources remain unexplained. Another example is electromagnetic propulsion. Attempts to construct such propulsion have been made many times before, and many devices currently operate based on electromagnetism. However, a mechanism that would directly convert electromagnetic energy to kinetic energy on a macroscale is not currently used to propel spacecraft. There are no devices powered solely by electromagnetic waves that would provide a counterweight to rocket propulsion. There are no solutions involving the interaction of an electromagnetic field with a gravitational field, or attempts to control the inertia of a solid body. Although the quantum physical foundations of matter and the processes of energy and matter exchange are known, it has yet to be demonstrated in connection with anything more than conventional space transport technology. In rocket propulsion, pressure generated in a chemical reaction is crucial; in electromagnetic propulsion, phenomena such as electromagnetic or paramagnetic resonance (EPR) or perhaps NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) could theoretically be used. To date, there is virtually no evidence of any significant success in such research. EM drive remains a technology generally treated with a pinch of salt. Despite its likely proven existence, the theoretical foundations firmly rule it out, due to factors such as its incompatibility with the principle of conservation of momentum or the dynamics of a solid body. Electromagnetic phenomena involving high frequencies are no stranger to modern technology; they have long been known, and the high energies associated with them are used in television, radio, and high-frequency electronics, among other things. There is a lack of connection between the technology currently in use and certain facts to which we do not yet possess the technological key. The blame can only be placed on the overall technological scheme and its characteristics, as well as the disappearance of certain psychological functions in the technological framework that would normally open the way to new things. There are several areas of knowledge gaps; it seems that the most important shortcoming is the lack of knowledge and predictions regarding the connection between solid-state dynamics and its thermodynamic representation. In this reality, science stalled somewhere around the beginning of the 20th century. The current state of technology is a consequence of the scientific framework that has been established, and the scientific framework is a consequence of the way we perceive reality. The way we perceive reality is a consequence of the way we have been educated and the information we have been exposed to, which is a consequence of the way we have been conditioned by our environment and the media. The media, in turn, is a consequence of the economic and political interests that shape it. This creates a feedback loop that reinforces the current state of technology and limits our ability to break out of it. To change this, we need to change our perception of reality, which requires changing our education and the information we are exposed to, which requires changing the media, which requires changing the economic and political interests that shape it. It's a complex problem, but it's not impossible to solve if we can find the right leverage points to intervene in this system.

From the contemporary perspective, technologies that do not conflict with the current civilizational and economic order are essential and have rational and decisive significance. The introduction of a completely new technology, detached from current requirements and expectations, depends on the degree to which it disrupts such technological patterns. Sometimes, implementing certain technologies requires the construction of a new infrastructure and the need to train people. Another challenge is the adaptation of this technology and its acceptance by the appropriate social structures where it will ultimately be implemented. In the contemporary world, contrary to some opinions, a "technological cold war" continues, one might say, which causes the global market for technological backbones to be frozen. Therefore, we are dealing with a so-called "creeping form of civilizational progress," despite the fact that development in some areas is exceptionally rapid, while the underlying framework remains unchanged. The question is to what extent modifying this framework through external processing methods can change its overall character enough to rip civilization from the path it has set. We have a crude and crude technology that is undergoing modifications in unknown directions, whose foundations, defining the general plane of existence, should be decisively and ruthlessly cut through by introducing rapid and radical solutions. Only then could we hope for some real and broader results. The current technological and economic machine, which has been grinding individuals and their life forces like a meat grinder, both in terms of economic possibilities and overall existential impact, has certain mechanisms that have long been malfunctioning. It is therefore not surprising that all predictions regarding civilizational development, which have served as the basis for many films, books, and imaginations about the contemporary world from the perspective of the decades since they were made, depart from current reality and were simply overly optimistic. No technology has yet been developed that would permanently free us from the bonds of gravity through appropriate technology, and the current picture is widely known. The progress we are witnessing in transportation, enthusiastically received by certain groups, is insignificant and irrelevant compared to the true demands placed on the fundamental realities of nature and the Earth's environment. We possess knowledge that doesn't actually change anything in the general state of affairs, especially in the existence of international society, and continues to have no significant impact on it. A preserving factor is the lack of funding for the right people and economic entities who have the potential to overcome fundamental technological barriers, which are bureaucratically and economically conditioned, leaving them no room to maneuver under the dictatorship of capital. Technologies of this type are now a reality. All solutions for vehicle propulsion and their independent energy supply, as well as other parallel developments, have existed for a long time, but are marginalized beyond the world's attention, remaining either in the prototype phase or undergoing experimental analysis to confirm their validity. There is no need to resort to overly advanced technologies that, for example, utilize high energies or forcefully defy physical and natural laws. However, there are exceptionally lightweight technologies, omitted from calculations and theoretical assumptions. Such solutions utilize magnetism, gravitational fields, or electromagnetism?ideas sometimes simple yet brilliant in their simplicity, which have been either forgotten or relegated to oblivion by the ubiquitous methodology of generating propulsion and energy with low efficiency. The ossification of this system could lead to the complete collapse of civilization and the return of poverty on an alarmingly large scale, which will slowly begin to gnaw away at the wealthy countries of the Northern Hemisphere, increasingly painfully and distressingly. It will also create problems for equatorial countries, leading to mass migration and the invasion of their inhabitants into regions with more favorable living conditions. For many people, both the wealthy, who live in abundance but are vulnerable to even the slightest disruption to their functional ecosystem, and the poor, who, despite their adaptability, are unable to overcome their existing conditions and conscious conditioning, there is no alternative that would immediately change the rules of the game. The change forced upon this type of system by conflict and extreme actions stemming from the dissatisfaction of lower-income individuals is beginning to spin out of control before the world's eyes and intensify, further increasing the number of local wars and unrest.

Happiness attracts happiness, and misfortune attracts misfortune. One form of misfortune for civilization is the struggle of everyone against everyone for financial opportunities and to implement their own, often contradictory, strategies and plans regarding the subjective perception of their role in society. The world has long become an arena of constant economic, political, and business struggles among many people and institutions, and until the basic needs of human life on Earth are met, stabilization of the unstable situation cannot be expected, both at the level of the smallest social groups and internationally. This is a global struggle that influences the possibility of shifting from a strategy of directly satisfying needs, pursued by governments, to a strategy dependent on a high level of technology, where life is automatically sustained. However, with the renewed imperialist ambitions of many countries, the world is unable to implement many ambitious projects, such as the discovery of new energy sources, space exploration plans, and new propulsion systems, within a satisfactory timeframe; these plans are being postponed. The economic potential of wealthier countries currently allows for research into fusion and the nature of plasma, but commercialization of this newly emerging sector is being postponed until the mid-21st century, a timeframe that may even be at risk. Currently, technological breakthroughs rely on multiplying access to knowledge and the internet. Knowledge engineering is a key element of civilizational progress, and along with computer science, it constitutes a driving force for civilization greater than, for example, heavy industry. Progress tends toward evolution, not revolution. However, in my opinion, the umbilical cord connecting us to our own planet should be severed as soon as possible. This could only be achieved by implementing radical technological advances. The problem, however, is the methodology, which prevents departure from established technological methods. The need to safeguard civilization in the event of a global tragedy requires it to expand beyond the solar system as quickly as possible, exploiting the potential hidden in the solar system's resources along the way. The sooner this happens, the better. Most people do not realize how threatened our civilization is. This threat seems unrelated to us, as we watch events unfold through the lens of televisions and monitors. However, the truth is that, in essence, no one protects us, and we are helpless against some threats, even with nuclear weapons, powerful lasers, and all the knowledge we already possess. To ourselves, we are a threat and a decimating epidemic at the same time. However, everything we do has a local, planetary impact, and within the planet's confined zone, we experience everything we do firsthand, as the damage inflicted by imperfect technology recurs, because we live in a tightly knit ecosystem. It seems that all of this represents a genuine lack of freedom and respect for human time, a chaotic nature that big data algorithms have yet to resolve. It's determined by an ever-increasing number of people, each with their own opinions and worldviews. Although the civilized world in the Northern Hemisphere, with its decision-making sphere, is a zone with a system based on democracy, we don't actually live in this system by choice, but by common sense. Those of us who have achieved something significant in society very often achieved it by exploiting loopholes and porosity in the legal system we live in, or by working our entire lives only to experience a mere four years of success before death. This is where we need to consider abandoning life as we know it, because the current one doesn't lead to solving any key problems. These are the absurdities of life on Earth. Even if 100 geniuses were to emerge and each solve 100 technological problems, human nature would remain the same, because we are creating a rather unique technology that still lacks definitive solutions, such as solving the problem of gravity and its application in technology. Another issue is the erosion and incompatibility of individual people with different ideas within the current scientific and technological system. This manifests itself as the collective thinking of those close to decision-makers, which prohibits dissenting views, especially in science. In this system, many controversial researchers have been rejected, relegated to economic oblivion, and legally blocked due to their own views. Although science continues to develop despite the unresolved paradoxes and lack of internal coherence, it is not developing as intensively as it could if the current course of focusing so much attention on theoretical foundations were abandoned, while data that arises only in the experimental phase of work on completely new issues were neglected. This cautionary approach negatively impacts the overall science landscape. At the same time, however, vast resources are being invested in the construction of increasingly complex measurement and experimental devices without paying attention to earlier, ingenious, and simple solutions that still haven't received the attention they deserve. Science is one thing, technology another, because it turns out that no particular science is necessary to achieve success using technology. There's too much hype surrounding science and too little real-world technological possibilities.

Earth's civilization is undergoing changes in increasingly dangerous directions. It's noticeable that there's a growing concern around the world related to the activities of certain individuals and institutions. The reality is bleak when the lives of billions depend so significantly on human-created technology, especially when it begins to backfire. Recently, more and more people want to dig up the hatchets and use existing technology to wreak destruction with irreversible consequences. One gets the impression that they see war and combat as a training ground where they want to hone their martial arts, but they want war primarily because, outside of it, their burgeoning arsenal makes no sense. Furthermore, their states and economies are also based on the military industry, not to mention the fact that their citizens, as a result, lack a comfortable standard of living and often struggle with a lack of basic necessities. Neither these countries nor those that have already achieved prosperity and economic stability are permanently secure, as they rely on unreliable and limiting technology, as fossil fuels will soon run out. The growing deficit in oil and other energy sources is driving sufficient efforts to meet this deficit, which requires technological expansion and influence over other territories where these resources are located. International law will once again be bent to meet the profit needs of the largest energy companies, leading to the exploitation of areas exposed by global warming, exterminating the flora and fauna present there. All trends worldwide demonstrate that destruction is once again attempting to achieve a different quality, which is utterly absurd, as destruction begets only destruction, even when carried out in the name of progress and for utilitarian purposes. The forcible introduction of various failed ideologies, including communist ideologies or ideologies based on individual dictatorship, has had its consequences, and everyone knows what they are, because the introduction of any ideology is bound to fail when it is rife with falsehoods and a lack of complementarity with common sense principles. Regarding the latest solutions, already hailed as the next technological revolution, the turbulent development of many high-tech industries is disappointing, as the foundations for energy supply and means of survival that keep civilization running at high speed are still unsecured and offer no hope of changing key prerogatives that determine the overall shape of the global economy. The system has been qualitatively locked down from above in terms of its development paths, and although civilization appears to be developing at a dizzying pace in the right direction, it is actually closer to complete failure than ever before in history. In this system, where people work but cannot fully enjoy the fruits of their labor because what they do is largely harnessed to a non-profitable void between technology and economic indicators with a shockingly low efficiency and is lost forever in the gears of the civilization machine, it is immediately clear why so many people want a new "hand," a new system in which they could realize their aspirations without burning out their own essential life forces, in favor of a system created without paying much attention to the moral code, in which, in fact, the only beneficiary is a handful of people excluded from civilization. However, the lives of the "useful consumers of the system" have been almost completely devalued in their confrontation with the monetary system in many respects, which is not surprising given that the fiscal system has already stifled so many positive initiatives on a global scale. Many have tried to address this fact before, but the available technology remained compatible only with this single distribution of power, and all actions were neither profitable nor complementary. Moreover, this situation has its roots in ancient history, ever since the Phoenicians invented the equivalent of goods and services in the form of money. On the other hand, it must be clearly stated in this case that humanity has become extremely dependent on its own technology, which has obscured its true and accurate view of the broader reality and which destroys its surroundings, only to be driven to the bottom of civilization with a violent effect that could strike us like a lightning bolt. It's true that thanks to modern solutions, we see more and understand more, and we discover our relationship with the surrounding and boundless reality, but the technological nonchalance with which we pursue this approach reaches to the point of at least lacking the basic ability to plan and predict developments on our own planet. Virtual reality is not just a reality generated by computers and software. This reality exists when, in the case of problems and challenges concerning important aspects of intelligent life on Earth, we assess them through the prism of apparent stability and prosperity, which many gloat about. And prosperity is a phenomenon thanks to which many people have wasted their lives or become as helpless as a newborn child, turning from wolves into prey. This happens because all the achievements of science and technology mean little when the character of their creators remains the same, and the lack of environmental stimulation often means the atrophy of functions responsible for survival and threat recognition. The situation in highly developed countries presents a picture of a fusion of races and cultures, leading to the transformation of societies into conglomerates sharing the same media and civilizational content. The overall global situation could be precisely this kind of fusion, where a future world government will introduce a common law, ethical and moral code, monetary system, and so on. This is not a world based on the diversification of cultures and philosophical currents, nor on diverse methods of thought. It may turn out to be essentially a return to the communist socialism familiar to many people, and the likelihood that censorship and the imposition of consistent templates will result in restrictions on freedom will then be no less significant. It is obvious that technology serves those who have access to the means to build it and benefit from the prerogatives it establishes. Others, excluded from the profits and other benefits, will lose out, or will build a different system, more disciplined and technologically advanced, with greater clout than the technology of their competitors. What good is it if we are still confined to our own planet? Earth is a limited area, a ghetto, both in terms of raw materials and consciousness. Sooner or later, this phenomenon impacts the standard of living of Earth's inhabitants, especially when the technology we have acquired proves unreliable, with devastating consequences for the average global citizen in the form of tragedies and disasters like the Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters, or even major oil spills from tankers and toxic emissions from chemical plants like the Union Carbide disaster, where thousands of people lost their lives. Few key global players are interested or even consider the potential beneficial effects of implementing certain solutions, and a large number of groundbreaking technologies lie fallow. No one uses them because there weren't enough charismatic people to push through and implement them, despite the technological mainstream. Those who are open-minded enough to realize this know this best. Others can only spend their lives digesting what others have prepared for them. Before civilization even reaches its proper developmental pace, it will enter very serious trouble. This possibility could effectively distance it from this dynamic for an unspecified period of time, with negative consequences for anyone at risk. Many devices developed by humans, including computers and generally all semiconductor-based devices, have lost their original identity and become superior tools, with a dictatorial quality, determining the order of day and night, without which there is no longer much external living space. It has come to pass that by introducing computers, civilization has armed itself with a high-powered charge in the form of exposure to computer system hacks on a potentially disastrous scale for the economy, especially in the face of the currently introduced Internet of Things technology. Power plants, factories, and government administration are connected to unreliable networks, and importantly, they do not need to be connected to the Internet; they are sufficiently based on binary code, which is easily cracked by a suitably skilled person with moderately advanced software. In reality, however, we are all participating in a process of artificial, unnatural, and unplanned expansion of our own brain tissue, which contrasts with the body's systematically diminishing physical abilities. This is tissue growth stimulated by semiconductor machines, leading to a degradation of the sphere responsible for independent and creative thinking, in favor of selective knowledge based on data inflation and its rapid devaluation. While this may be true, there is no turning back from the current processes of technological development, so there is no point in finding fault. Besides, everyone has reason and thought processes that should protect them from the adverse effects of many phenomena in the process of acquiring knowledge. However, the knowledge acquired seems of little use when we compare two situations: on the one hand, learning occurs through the use of associative processes in natural conditions, and on the other, it occurs in a limited world limited to two numbers?zero and one?and to the sphere of games. The problem of cultivating knowledge has stabilized at a single point without going any further, because the science being prepared for mortals, intended to create technology in today's reality, is unable to complete the most crucial areas of knowledge. It seems as if humanity has stalled at many scientific and technological stages right now, and no one knows whether the culprit is a fear of revealing and admitting to vast swathes of ignorance when confronted with the surrounding ocean of knowledge, which is completely untapped and necessary for human assimilation, as well as space itself, or simply a fear of changing the world and social order, stemming from the desire to maintain our own economic zones, the existence of which would result in the end of civilization as we know it and, above all, introduce a free energy renaissance and open access to space, because these two regions are still inaccessible, and no one except specific groups of people receives the benefits derived from their rationalization. Of course, knowledge is very important, but knowledge itself is of no greater value if it does not fulfill a function in which the beneficiary is its possessor and another person or other social groups. We accumulate knowledge for ourselves, but how it works depends on a different moral mechanism in terms of nature. This type of knowledge should, in time, enable humans to develop technology adequate to their own needs, rather than experiencing collective stagnation on a global scale, accentuated by monotonous adherence to the same technology, despite proven physical facts. Furthermore, existing technology is at a stage that prevents us from detecting problems related to the most crucial scientific and technological challenges. It should be emphasized that it is too closely linked to the cradle of humanity, Earth. This is perhaps not surprising, as we begin with our own planet, with the goal of doing everything possible to expand beyond our own galaxy, in order to learn and strengthen the values ??represented by the power flowing from our culture and civilization. This means, as we can see, that we still have much to do. However, it seems that before this happens, discord and differences stemming from our faiths and beliefs could lead to tragedy, and the deadline for agreement will not arrive when it is most needed. In all these problems, it is only necessary to prevent the fate of man from becoming part of these global tragedies, and from being exterminated due to the fact that a few people from lucrative spheres could not come to an agreement and reach a compromise. It is true that the struggle between nations is nothing new and has been going on for centuries, but the nonsense and utopia of building entire physics and technologies so as not to become too easy a military target for the enemy is known to those who will forever be relegated to a protracted convalescence, both physically and morally, due to the "war" on various fronts of the modern world.